Reimagining Housing at Brown University A user interfaces project by Victoria Yom, Avery Crits-Cristoph, and Polina Tamarina
The Problem
Every year, Brown University administrators and Residential Life workers have to figure out how to get 6,000 undergraduates placed successfully into housing. They have to successfully execute the Housing Lottery (a process where students choose their rooms online in 2 minutes when it's their turn as dictated by a numerical lottery), handle room change requests, accommodate students with disabilities, figure out where to put students coming home from study abroad, make sure nothing is catching on fire, and keep everyone satisfied. As one might imagine, this is a difficult task. Currently, Brown University's main method of providing students with housing information and handling paperwork is the Residential Life website, and a couple other auxiliary sites. As we can see below, they're far from ideal. Many of them are confusing visually and logically, but most importantly none of them provide a flexible model for handling the high volume and complexity of input that constitutes students' needs during the housing process. The content is decentralized, and frequently non-visual.
"I went into the lottery for the first time as a sophomore, and it was one of the most stressful experiences I've had at Brown. There's no way to know what room you're really picking. You kind of just cross your fingers, choose before time runs out, and hope for the best." -3rd year student
"Information is... difficult to find and unclear." -2nd year student
"Some RPL's just make a PowerPoint about the Lottery for their residents- it's not our job, but a lot of the time we're their only real resource." - Brown RPL
Designing for 3 Personas
We knew we wanted our system to be helpful to a wide range of users, and we designed our interface around the main three: students, Residential Peer Leaders (RPL's), and administrators. We wanted to create a comprehensive system, but we also knew that catering to all involved, particularly the administration, would improve the viability of implementation.
FIRST SKETCHES
We started thinking about our solution in two parts. The first was some kind of student profile to allow students to manage housing preferences and applications/paperwork in one place. The second was an interactive housing map, which students could use during their allotted two minutes of the Housing Lottery to investigate floor plans and building information (how many kitchens, common rooms, etc.)
WIREFRAMES
We wanted the site to be simple, uncluttered, and easy for stressed students and overworked administrators to navigate. We experimented with different user flows- tab based versus one linear process. We split up preferences and paperwork between the Profile and a To-Do list, and started thinking more about how information would flow through the site and be approved by the curating administrators.
Final Product
After lots of iteration, we finally created this: the Brown Housing Portal.
Conclusion
Our UI solution to the issues we saw essentially relied on building flexible models for two parts of the existing system: bureaucratic information flow and management (Profile & To-Do) and housing information access and management (Interactive Map). Our main priorities were to create a system that was intuitively learnable, and relied on existing conceptual models of online profiles and to do lists. Our map utilizes existing data- like room reports, building maps and floor plans- to create a tool that improves the quality of information students have access to when choosing their own housing, and the speed with which they can sift through this information during (and before) the fast paced Lottery. Ultimately, our UI benefits all 3 of our personas- the students and RPL's who benefit most directly from the streamlined system, and the administrators and Community Directors who are able to keep track of student information, pending paperwork, room conditions, and occupancy in a visual manner while reducing strain on Residential Life and Facilities staff due to questions and complaints.